ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAAAB
1
Daily NAWeightBP (MAP)RHRFatigueSleep QualitySorenessStressMoodTotalHours Trained
2
2000160956922333132*average baselineCorrelations at 2 Weeks
3
2000160956922333131.5*average baselineSodium / Weight0.00
4
2000160956922333131.5*average baselineSodium / BP (MAP)-1.00
5
2000160956922333131*average baselineSodium / RHR-1.00
6
2000160956922333132*average baselineSodium / Fatigue Reduction0.66
7
2000160956922333130*average baselineSodium / Sleep Quality0.75
8
2000160956922333132*average baseline, actual BP takenSodium / Soreness Reduction0.05
9
5100160946133333152Sodium / AWQ0.75
10
5100160946134334171.5
11
5100160946123244151.5T-Tests (p)
12
5100160946133345181.25Sodium / BP (MAP)1.09E-10
13
5100160946123233131Sodium / RHR9.87E-11
14
5100160946132434160Sodium / Fatigue Reduction7.17E-11
15
5100160946124444182Sodium / Sleep Quality7.15E-11
16
5100160946145434202Sodium / Soreness Reduction7.22E-11
17
5100160946135345202.25Sodium / AWQ7.45E-11
18
5100160946144245190.5
19
5100160946134544202.25Correlations at 4 Weeks
20
5100160946143334170.5Sodium / Weight
21
5100160946134323152Sodium / BP (MAP)0.12
22
5100160946135234172*actual BP taken, above spaces filled for statsSodium / RHR-0.79
23
6300160975645243182Sodium / Fatigue Reduction0.69
24
6300160975645244191Sodium / Sleep Quality0.66
25
6300160975655344210.5Sodium / Soreness Reduction0.10
26
6300160975644433182Sodium / AWQ0.78
27
6300160975642344170.5
28
6300160975633424162T-Tests (p)
29
6300160975634433171.5Sodium / BP (MAP)5.71E-19
30
6300160946444324171Sodium / RHR4.97E-19
31
6300160946435344191.5Sodium / Fatigue Reduction3.17E-19
32
6300160946445243180.75Sodium / Sleep Quality3.17E-19
33
6300160946424444181.5Sodium / Soreness Reduction3.21E-19
34
6300160946442454191Sodium / AWQ3.37E-19
35
6300160946435344192
36
6300160946444443191*actual BP taken, above spaces filled for stats
37
38
Notes and Follow Up:
39
Sodium Intake - was shown as estimates only, taken from my daily meal plan which remains 90% consistent day-to-day, and 80% consistent on the weekends. In the future a nutrient tracking app could be used for more accurate measurements
40
41
Blood Pressure - was not taken daily, this would be ideal and give more accurate results as well. For convenience, blood pressure was taken at approximately two week intervals and indicated in the raw data with bold font. MAP was used to consider differences in both systolic and diastolic pressure.
42
43
Baseline AWQ - was estimated based on a two day average that was the motivation for this experiment. The averaged values were applied to the entire control week, though improved control would include daily samples for the control week.
44
45
Body Weight - was only taken at the intervals entered in bold font. Additional columns were filled to calculate statistics.
46
Comorbidity - There is the potential that "normal adaptation" occurred with regard to AWQ scores (in particular soreness and fatigue). However, this would suggest that as adaptation (to training volume / intesnity) occurs, sleep quality improves; which seems illogical. Similarly, though a stronger case may be made for, the correlated decrease in RHR being caused by phyiscal adaptation.
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100